🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if such holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."